But although I think that this is a really novel and fascinating idea, I have my doubts. Part of Lapucci's argument rests on the fact that Caravaggio used an "abnormal number" of left-handed subjects in his early works, since a light sensitive image would have been projected on a canvas backwards. (According to Lapucci, Caravaggio later depicts right-handed subjects in his paintings, which indicates that the artist used improved darkroom technologies in his later career). My problem with this argument is that I can only find three Caravaggio paintings with (possible) left-handed subjects, even in his early works. Just about all of the sitters appear to be right-handed (for example, see Judith Beheading Holofernes, Boy Peeling Fruit, Lute Player, and The Musicians). Here are the only lefties that I found:
Caravaggio, Bacchus, c. 1597
(A discovery regarding this painting was recently in the news - see my thoughts here)
Caravaggio, Catherine of Alexandria, c. 1598
Does Lapucci consider this subject to be left-handed, since
her left hand is closer to the handle of the sword? Hmm.
Caravaggio, Saint John the Baptist, 1610
This is a late work (in terms of Caravaggio's career), but the sitter is using his left hand to hold a staff. (Does that mean, though, that he is left-handed? Or that light sensitive technology was used? Hmm.)
(A discovery regarding this painting was recently in the news - see my thoughts here)
Caravaggio, Catherine of Alexandria, c. 1598
Does Lapucci consider this subject to be left-handed, since
her left hand is closer to the handle of the sword? Hmm.
Caravaggio, Saint John the Baptist, 1610
This is a late work (in terms of Caravaggio's career), but the sitter is using his left hand to hold a staff. (Does that mean, though, that he is left-handed? Or that light sensitive technology was used? Hmm.)
And...that's it. From what I could find, those three are the only Caravaggio paintings that possibly manifest left-handed subjects. Feel free to try and find others - I'd love to see if anyone finds more lefties in Caravaggio's work. For now, though, I feel like this part of Lapucci's argument is pretty weak. You can decide for yourself, gentle reader, whether the number three constitutes an "abnormal number" for left-handed subjects.